|
Problems
on the Muslim
Understanding of the Mandaeans
Doē.Dr. Şinasi Gündüz
From the beginning of the Islamic era onwards
Muslims have been interested in the Sābians
since the Sābians as a religious group are
mentioned in the Qur'an.
Although the Qur'an mentions them only by name
among the ahl al-kitāb with the Jews and
the Christians, it does not give any information
about their identity, cults and believing
system. The Muslim scholars from the early
period to the modern time have therefore been
interested in this term and tried to explain the
religious identity of the Sābians of the Qur'an.
The extant Islamic sources do not
give any information about the existence of the
argument on the Sābians at the time of Muhammad.
We know that the opponents of Muhammad who
objected to the Qur'anic message asked him many
questions about the statements of the Qur'an
which were unknown for them. However, they were
silent when the Qur'an mentioned the Sābians
with the other religious groups such as the
Jews, Christians and Magians. This obviously
shows that mainly because of their trading
journey the Arabs of Hijāz had knowledge of the
Sābians as a religious group.
During his time the Prophet Muhammad
as well as his followers was also called sābiī
by his opponents.
Although some of the early Muslim scholars such
as 'Abd al-Rahmān ibn Zayd (d. 798 AD), Ibn
Jurayj (d. 767 AD) and 'Atā ibn Abī Rabah (d.
732 AD) have seen a specific connection between
the term Sābiī, used for Muhammad and his
companions, and the Sabians who live in the
region of Sawād, it is most probable that the
Arabs used this term for Muhammad and his
followers in the meaning of "apostate" since
Muhammad left the traditional religion of the
Arabs and introduced a new believing system
based on strict monotheism.
After Muhammad the Muslim
commentators of the Qur'an (mufassirūn)
tried to explain who the Sabians whom the Qur'an
mentioned three times were. They were not
particularly interested in the Sabians; and
their explanation on the Sabians was generally
only a few sentences. Their main aim was to give
an explanation of some statements and terms of
the Qur'an which needed to be explained, and the
term sābiūn (or sābiīn) was one of
them.
Most of
these Muslim scholars who lived in the first two
Islamic centuries stated that the Sabians were a
religious group who lived in southern
Mesopotamia. According to their statement the
Sabians particularly live in Kūsā, Sawād and
Jazīrah al-Mawsil in Iraq. About the Sabian
religion they maintain that the Sabians have a
religious system in itself which resembles from
many points Christianity, Judaism and Magianism.
Some of these early scholars such as Wahb ibn
Munabbih (d. 728-732 AD) and 'Abd al-Rahman ibn
Zayd even state that the Sabians worship only
one true God.
We also
see from many sources that during the first two
Islamic centuries many Muslim scholars believed
that the Sabians were among the ahl al-kitāb,
while some did not accept this for they believed
that the term ahl al-kitāb was a specific
term for only the Jews and the Christians.
Likewise, the Muslim rulers during that time
treated the Sabian community in Islamic empire
as a religious group belonged to ahl al-dhimma
(the subject people), a status given to the
non-Muslims, mainly to the Christians and the
Jews, who live under Muslim government. Some
Muslim rulers even thought to recognise an
exclusive right to the Sabians because they
thought the beliefs of the Sabians were nearer
Islam than the other groups among ahl al-dhimma.
In these Muslim rulers' opinion the most
important feature which showed the proximity of
the beliefs of the Sabians to Islam was the
belief in God of the Sabians. The following
narration is quite important for this. According
to the information given by Hasan al-Basrī (d.
728), Ziyād ibn Abīhī (d. 672), the governor of
Iraq at the time of the first Umayyad caliph
Mu'āwiyah, had met the Sabians and wanted to
exempt them from the poll-tax (jizyah),
but when he was informed that they worshipped
the angels (malāikah) he changed his
decision.
It is
quite clear that the Sabians of the Qur'an who
were described by these early scholars are the
Mandaeans of southern Iraq. We know that the
Mandaeans have been living in this area since
the second century AD. They migrated from
Palestine first to the mountainous lands of
Media (Adiabene), then to the marshy region of
southern Mesopotamia. By the second century AD
they were in this new homeland where they
settled under Parthian protection. Also we know
that the Mandaean beliefs and cults have many
similarities to Judaism, Christianity and
Iranian religion, and carry various elements
from these religious traditions. These early
Muslim scholars were therefore correct when they
stated the Sabians have a religious system
resembling Christianity, Judaism and Magianism.
In the
early Islamic period (first two centuries) we do
not generally see such problems on the
identification and place of settlement of the
Sabians as we see in later sources. Although
there are some differences between these Muslim
scholars on some characteristics of the Sabians,
there is a common opinion about the
identification of the Sabians and the main
characteristic features of the Sabian religion.
We also see in this early period that the Muslim
rulers as well as the Muslim scholars were
generally tolerant of the Sabians since they saw
them as a group among the ahl al-dhimma.
Although the Mandaean sources do not generally
talk about the Muslims positively,
an account in Haran Gawaita seems
supporting the idea that the Muslims treated
them as ahl al-kitāb when they first met
the Mandaeans, so there was no tribulation
against them.
The
Abbasid period has been an important mile-stone
for beginning of the speculations on the Sabians.
These speculations were mainly based on the
claim that the Sabians were the pagans,
adherents of the planet cult of ancient
Mesopotamia. From this period onwards most of
the Muslim scholars have seen a special
connection between the term "Sabians" and the
pagans of Harran. Even such important Muslim
scholars as al-Mas'ūdī (d. 957), Ibn Hazm al-Qurtūbī
(d. 1063), al-Shahristānī (d. 1153) and Abū 'Abd
Allah Muhammad al-Qurtūbī (d. 1282) identified
Sabians with the Harranians whom they called
"the Sabians from Harran".
Although the early Muslim scholars (commentators
of the Qur'an and the jurists) neither mentioned
the city of Harran nor the Harranians in
relation with the Sabians, the later Muslim
writers especially emphasised Harran as the
dwelling place of the Sabians whenever they
talked about the Sabians. The characteristic
features of the Harranians such as paganism,
polytheism and star and idol worshipping have
therefore been described as the characteristics
of the Sabians. This was also contrary to the
early scholars since they never, as stated
earlier, mentioned the characteristics such as
paganism, polytheism and so on when they
described the Sabians.
Some
Muslim scholars of that time such as Ibn al-Nadīm
(d. 995), Abd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī (d. 1037),
and al-Bīrūnī (d. 1048) maintained that there
was another Sabian group, Sabāt al-Batā'ih,
living in the southern Mesopotamia. They also
stressed that Sabāt al-Batā'ih were completely
different from the Harranians. Even some of them
emphasised that the Harranians were not the real
Sabians, but pseudo-Sabians. In spite of
this they continued to use the term Sabians as a
particular name for the Harranians, and
described the characteristics of the Harranians
as that of the Sabians.
The Muslim
writers, especially the commentators and
jurists, have continued to hold this point of
view on the Sabians up to now. They have
repeated the idea of those Muslim scholars who
described Harranians as the Sabians and accused
the Sabians of being idolaters and
star-worshippers. Although the Harranian
community has disappeared from the history since
the Mongol invasion into Harran in the
thirteenth century, the common belief that the
Sabians were the star and idol worshippers did
not change. Thus the Muslims continued to make
the same accusation for the Sabians of the Marsh
(sabat al-batā'ih), i.e. the Mandaeans.
Speculations on the Sabians/Mandaeans have
continued in the Muslim world up to now. Not
only the Arab writers like Abd al-Razzaq al-Hasanī
but also many Turkish writers (especially the
commentators of the Qur'an and the historians of
Islam) did nothing but simply repeated the
speculations found in the medieval Islamic
sources. Many modern scholars have seen a
religious identity between the Harranians and
the Mandaeans, both of whom are called Sabians
traditionally, and held the idea that the
Sabians, whoever they are and wherever they
live, are the star worshippers. For example,
following such Muslim writers as Ibn Hazm al-Qurtūbī,
al-Shahristānī and Ibn Kesīr (d. 1372), the
famous commentator of the Qur'an, they claim
that the Sabians are the star and idol
worshippers whom the prophet Abraham invited to
the true religion of God.
Moreover, just repeating the traditional
accusation against the Sabians many modern
translators of the Qur'an into Turkish have
translated the term sābiūn/sābiīn
as simply "the star-planet worshippers".
A modern Turkish scholar, C. Yıldırım, has
recently identified the Sabians of the Qur'an
with the Mandaeans in his commentary on the
Qur'an and claimed that the Mandaeans are the
pagans and that the temples of the Mandaeans (Mandi)
are full of idols symbolising the stars and
planetary deities.
On the other hand, again following the medieval
sources some modern Muslim scholars do not
identify the Mandaeans with the Sabians of the
Qur'an. A Turkish professor of Qur'anic
commentary, İ. Cerrahoğlu, has, for instance,
claimed that the Mandaeans are not the Sabians
but the Christians.
He also claimed that both the Harranians and the
Mandaeans are not connected with the Sabians. In
his opinion the Sabians of the Qur'an are the
members of religious group who vanished in
history.
Various
explanations on the enigmatic term sābiūn/sābiīn
of the Qur'an have been one the most important
problem for the Muslim understanding of the
Mandaeans. As stated before, the early Muslim
scholars have described the Mandaeans as the
Sabians of the Qur'an since their description on
the identification and dwelling place of the
Sabians is generally suitable for the Mandaeans.
However, the later Muslim writers as well as
some non-Muslim writers like Maimonides
established a special connection between the
Harranians and the Sabians and called the
Harranians "the Sabians from Harran". They
therefore described the Harranian cults and
beliefs as the characteristics of the Sabians.
Thus the Harranian factor has been an important
source for the speculations on the Sabians.
When and
how the Harranians adopted the name Sabians and
whether or not there is a connection between the
Harranians and the Mandaeans, both of whom were
called Sabians by the later Muslim scholars,
have been discussed by many scholars. Although
some scholars like Drower, who suggested that
the Harranians had points of common belief with
the orthodox Mandaeans, claimed that there might
be a connection between the Harranians and the
Mandaeans,
it is quite clear that there is no religious
identification or connection between the
Harranians and the Mandaeans. Apart from the
very common points of belief like believing the
existence of the seven heavenly spheres which
can be seen in almost all religions of the
Middle East, both religions are completely
different from each other. We, for instance,
cannot see the planet cult (especially the Sin
cult), Hermetic tradition, the human sacrifice
and idolatry of the Harranians in the religion
of the Mandaeans. Again we cannot see the
vitally important characteristics of the
Mandaeans such as the Gnostic dualism and the
water cult in the Harranian religion. However,
the term Sabians has been used for the members
of both of these religious traditions and the
Muslim writers particularly described the
Harranian religious tradition under the title of
Sabian religion. This particular usage of the
term for the Harranian pagans led many Muslims
to a conviction that the Mandaeans called
Sabians by their neighbours were also pagans and
star-idol worshippers. On the other hand, as we
mentioned earlier, we know that during the early
Islamic times this term was only used for a
religious group who lived in southern
Mesopotamia and had a religious system
resembling the Christianity, Judaism and
Magianism. These characteristics are certainly
suitable for the Mandaeans but not for the
pagans of Harran whom the early Muslim scholars
never mention. If that is the case, we have a
problem of when and why the Harranians adopted
the name Sabians.
A
narration found in al-fihrist by Ibn al-Nadīm
states that the Harranians adopted the name "Sabians"
after the Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun's threat.
According to this narration al-Ma'mun threatened
the Harranian pagans with death unless they
accepted one of the religions which the Qur'an
mentioned. Abū Yusuf 'Isha al-Qatī'ī, the
Christian narrator of this account, says that
after a time of confusion the Harranians then
accepted a recommendation of adopting the name
Sabians. He also maintains that before this time
there had been no group in Harran or vicinity
called Sabians. Some scholars are suspicious
about this account,
but we have various evidence other than this
which supports the idea that the Harranians
adopted the name Sabians at a late date,
possibly during the Abbasid, period. The Muslim
writers such as Hamzah al-Isfahānī (d. 961), Ibn
Mūsā al-Khawārizmī (d. 980-981) and al-Bīrūnī
also state that the Harranians adopted the name
Sabians during the Abbasid period and emphasise
that before this adoption they were known under
the names of "the Chaldaeans", "heathens",
"idolaters" or simply "the Harranians".
Besides, as we mentioned above, none of the
earlier Muslim scholars mentions Harran or the
Harranians regarding with the Sabians. These
Muslim scholars also do not mention the
paganism, idolatry, planet cult or the other
characteristic features of the people of Harran
as the characteristics of the Sabians. On the
other hand we know from many sources that the
paganism, idolatry and planet cult have been the
striking features of the people of Harran
throughout the history. Moreover, when they talk
about the conquest of Harran, the early Muslim
writers do not mention the Sabians at all
regarding the Harranian people. Abū Yūsuf
(d.798), the jurist, for instance, records that
the Harranian people during the Muslim conquest
consist of the Nabataeans (the Syriac speaking
non-Arabs) and the refugees from Greece.
All of these points clearly show that the
Harranians adopted the name Sabians in a late
period possibly in order to continue to live as
a minority in Islamic empire.
The
Harranians known as "the Sabians from Harran"
have soon become so popular in Islamic empire in
various subjects of science from medicine to
literature that the Muslims gave particular
attention to them. While some Harranian scholars
like Thābit ibn Qurrā who played a prominent
role in intellectual circles strongly defended
the Harranian paganism and idolatry even in the
courts of the caliphs, the Sabians of the
Marsh/the Mandaeans or the Sabians of the Qur'an
according to the early Muslim thought survived
as an obscure small community, far away from
sight. The Muslim writers were thus particularly
interested in the well-known Harranians under
the name of the Sabians and described their
cults and believing system as the religion of
the Sabians. Because of this widespread
information given by the Muslim writers, the
Muslim community generally identified the
Sabians with the Harranians and thought that the
paganism and star and idol worshipping were the
main characteristics of the religion of the
Sabians. Although some scholars emphasised that
the Harranians were only the pseudo-Sabians and
that the real Sabians/Mandaeans were different
from the Harranians, the Muslim people who did
not know enough the so-called obscure Mandaeans
mostly identified them with the Harranians and
thought that the Mandaeans, too, were the pagans
and idolaters.
As is
seen, the Harranian factor has been an important
problem for the Muslim understanding of the
Mandaeans. Not only in the Arabic world but also
almost in every place throughout the Islamic
geography the Muslims who inherited the
speculations on the Sabians based on the
Harranian factor have, up to now, carried on the
belief that the Sabians, whether Harranians or
the Mandaeans, are the adherents of the ancient
planet cult and idolatry of Mesopotamia.
Dependent
upon the Harranian factor many medieval Muslim
scholars have used the term "Sabian" in a
general meaning of "pagan". The later Muslim
scholars such as al-Jassās (d. 981), Ibn Hazm
al-Qurtūbī, Ibn Athīr (d.1233), Abū al-Fidā (d.
1282) and Shams al-Dīn al-Dimashqī (d. 1326)
called every pagan "Sabian". For example, al-Jassās,
commentator on the Qur'an, says that the ancient
people of Iraq and Syria, and the Greeks before
Constantine were the Sabians.
al-Dimashqī, the geographer, states that the
ancient Greeks, Indians, Persians, Copts and
even Arabs before Muhammad were the Sabians.
Abū al-Qāsim Sa'īd al-Andalūsī (d. 1070) claims
that the Turks and the Chinese as well as the
Greeks and the Persians were the Sabians.
Even al-Bīrūnī and al-Mas'ūdī, famous Muslim
scholars, use the term Sabians for idolaters in
general, like the other Muslim scholars of that
period. al-Bīrūnī claims that the Buddha (Budasaf)
called the people to the religion of the Sabians
while al-Mas'ūdī uses the term of the Sabians
for the members of the various ancient and
contemporary sects scattered in a wide area from
China to Egypt.
Some
Muslim scholars even claimed that the Christians
were also the Sabians. For example, Ibn Hazm al-Qurtūbī
maintained that the Christians, too, were among
the Sabians since they believed in the Trinity.
So the term Sabian was used for almost every
non-Muslim from China to Greece, but
particularly for the idolaters and pagans.
Moreover
some of the Muslim scholars, especially Ibn Hazm
al-Qurtūbī and al-Shahrastānī, have made a
special connection between the Sabians and the
people of the prophet Abraham. Depending upon
the story of Abraham in the Qur'an, these
scholars maintained that the people during the
time of Abraham were the Sabians, the star and
idol worshippers. These Sabians were the
infidels living throughout Mesopotamia. Abraham
struggled against them and tried to convert them
into the true religion of God. Some of them
accepted this but most of them refused. This
point of view, which is obviously based upon the
idea that the Sabians are the star and idol
worshipping pagans, is still held by some modern
Muslim scholars as well as the medieval writers
such as Fakhruddīn al-Rādī (d. 1209) and
Nizāmuddīn Hasan al-Naysābūrī (d.1327).
Following al-Shahrastānī, a Turkish scholar has,
for instance, recently maintained that the
Sabians are the people against whom the prophet
Abraham struggled, and argued that the Sabianism
(Sabian religion) is the source of the other
pagan religions such as that of the Babylonians
and the ancient Arabs.
This usage
of the term Sabian in the meaning of pagan and
star-idol worshipper in general led the Muslim
community to think that everybody known as
Sabian was an idolater and star and planet
worshipper. They therefore thought that the
Mandaeans who have been an obscure community for
their neighbours were also the idolaters and
star worshippers since they were the Sabians,
the adherents of the pagan community at the time
of Abraham.
It would
be appropriate here to ask why the Muslims did
not get in touch with the Mandaeans, who lived
with them for ages, to try to understand their
cults and beliefs. We know that the accusation
which claims the Mandaeans or Subbī of southern
Mesopotamia are the star-planet worshippers like
the people of ancient Mesopotamia at the time of
the prophet Abraham is certainly wrong. Although
the Mandaeans like the other communities of the
Middle East accept the existence of the planets,
unlike the pagan communities they abhor planet
worship because according to their belief these
planetary spheres and their guardians are
basically evil, demonic in nature, and persist
in obstructing the way of the soul on its
ascent. Also idolatry is prohibited and the idol
worshippers are damned in the Mandaean
tradition. For example, Ginza certainly
forbids the Mandaeans to worship the idols, the
images, the error and the confusion of the
world.
Although
some Muslims had the chance of observing the
Mandaeans because of the neighbourhood, the
majority of the Muslims did not have that
chance. Their knowledge of the Mandaeans was
mainly based on the speculative information
found in the writings of the Muslim scholars.
Even the knowledge of those Muslims who lived
near the Mandaeans was not enough to draw a
clear picture about the Mandaeans. For example,
a number of the early Muslim scholars whose
descriptions on the Sabians of the Qur'an are,
as already stated, mostly suitable for the
Mandaeans were closely connected with the
southern Mesopotamia where the Mandaeans lived.
Ziyād ibn 'Abīhi was, for instance, the governor
of Iraq; Hasan al-Basrī and Abū al-Zanād were
originally from Iraq, Abū Hanīfah (d. 767) and
Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855), the famous founders
of the schools of Islamic Law, lived in Iraq,
and finally Khalil ibn Ahmad (d. 786-787) and
many others lived in the region where the
Mandaeans lived.
These scholars were generally right when they
said the religion of the Sabians resembled at
many points Judaism, Christianity and Magianism,
but their information about some specific
characteristics of the Mandaeans was obscure and
unclear. For example, many of them stated that
the Sabians worshipped the malāikah and
read zabūr, the Psalms. These were, of
course, not correct since the Mandaeans neither
worshipped the angels nor read the Psalms as a
holy scripture. Due to their limited observation
these Muslim scholars, however, probably
supposed that the Mandaeans worshipped the
angels (malāikah), for the Mandaeans call
the supreme beings malkia, and that they
read zabūr since some parts of the
Mandaean scriptures, especially Ginza Smala
and Qolasta, were in hymn style.
Like some
other religious communities one of whose main
characteristics is secrecy and isolation from
the rest of community the Mandaean community has
long been an obscure religious group for their
neighbours. We know that as a Gnostic community
the Mandaeans have always tried to be far away
from sight. They have usually lived in the quiet
and secluded villages of marshy region of
southern Iraq though some have migrated to the
towns and big cities like Baghdad and Basrah.
Also we know that every Mandaean has two
personal names, one is the worldly name and
other is the religious (malwaşa) name.
The former which is usually an Islamic name is
his laqāb, but the malwaşa name is
the real name. The Mandaeans use their worldly
names in daily life while they use their
malwaşa names during all religious occasions
and ceremonies.
The reason of carrying an Islamic name in a
Muslim environment and using this in a mixed
society is presumably connected with the rule of
secrecy.
The
Mandaean religion forbids the believers to
reveal the secrets (secret beliefs, cults etc.)
to a non-Mandaean. Revealing the secrets of the
religion to a foreigner is thought a sin. Lady
Drower, for example, writes in her monumental
study that when a Mandaean informed her about
the secret names of malkia, he was quite
worried because he thought the other Mandaeans
would be angry if they knew that.
Because of the rule of secrecy the Mandaeans
have generally been reluctant to talk about
their religious beliefs and cults or their holy
scriptures unless there is a necessity to do
this as is the case when they first met the
Muslim invaders in Iraq.
As some of
the Mandaean writings discuss,
the neighbours of the Mandaeans have often asked
them some questions on various subjects to learn
their religion. When talking to people of
another faith to answer their questions, the
Mandaeans have, as Drower stressed,
usually accentuated small points of resemblance
between their beliefs and those of their
hearers. However, this limited information given
by them was not enough for their neighbours to
draw a clear picture on their religious
tradition. Speculation on their believing system
and cults has consequently become inevitable.
Thus, their neighbours have not avoided accusing
them of the common accusation mentioned above.
Briefly, the rule of secrecy in Mandaean
tradition has been another reason for
speculations on the Mandaeans made by the
Muslims although it is not so important as the
Harranian factor.
The
socio-political reasons seem to be another
problem for the Muslim understanding of the
Mandaeans. The Muslims, as stated earlier,
treated the Mandaean community as ahl
al-kitāb when they conquered the area where
the Mandaeans lived. Like the other non-Muslim
groups in Islamic empire, the Mandaeans, too,
continued to live in their homeland by paying a
poll-tax (jizyah) to Muslim government.
Although no persecution happened against them
during the conquest, as Haran Gawaita
emphasises, the Muslim invasion must have caused
some problems. Some of them must have migrated
north-east just before or during the invasion
because a statement in Haran Gawaita
indicates that the number of the Mandaeans in
southern Iraq was reduced after the Muslim
conquest.
Yet, there is no evidence which shows that the
Muslims treated the Mandaeans badly during the
invasion.
However,
we see that, as time passed, the attitude of the
Muslim rulers toward the Mandaeans changed, and
that from time to time persecution of the
Mandaeans caused by local governors has
unfortunately taken place. Some statements in
various Mandaean writings give examples of such
persecution against the Mandaean community in
various times. Haran Gawaita argues about
the increase of persecution and tribulation
against the Mandaeans under the Muslim
domination.
Also some of the colophons found at the end of
Mandaean writings sometimes talk about the
oppression and torment caused by the local
rulers of the Mandaeans as well as by their
Muslim neighbours. For example, the colophon of
Diwan Masbuta d Hibil Ziwa mentions the
persecution of the Mandaean community in Iraq
during the late Ottoman period.
A report in this colophon which relates how
Thamīr ibn Ghadbān, a local ruler or head of the
Muslim community in 1254 AH, circumcised the
Mandaeans, about a hundred men and women, by
force is especially noticeable.
We
understand from these accounts that the Mandaean
community like other minorities has sometimes
urged to be assimilated and that some Muslim
rulers have used force against them to do this.
This attitude against the Mandaeans is obviously
contrary to the attitude of the early times when
the Mandaeans had a right of living free under
Muslim rule. It is possible to take into
consideration the various points (such as the
increase of intolerance in Muslim community, the
enmity and jealousy between the neighbours, and
some economical and historical matters) as the
reasons for change of attitude of the Muslims
against the Mandaeans. However, it is certain
that the unjust widespread accusations against
the Mandaeans that they are the idolaters and
star-planet-worshipping infidels have always
been an important factor in changing the
Muslims' attitude toward the Mandaeans and in
increasing the hate and hostility between two
communities. Some local rulers might have used
these common accusations to justify their
attitude, as is the case of Thamīr ibn Ghadbān
mentioned above, and to get the support of the
Muslim community.
m 3 |